Samsung Galaxy M16 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Vivo Y300 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Samsung Galaxy M16
Samsung Galaxy M16
-
Dimensity 6300
6 nm
-
5000 mAh
25W
-
6.7"
1080 x 2340 pixels
-
50 MP
1080p@30fps
-
Specs
2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76
6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55
2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78
6x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55
6GB 128GB
8GB 128GB
8GB 256GB (UFS 2.2)
f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF
5 MP
f/2.2, (ultrawide), 1/5.0", 1.12µm
2 MP
f/2.4, (macro)
f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF
2 MP
f/2.4, (depth)
f/2.0, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm
f/2.5, (wide)
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano (Hybrid)
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
11 5G bands
n1, n3, n5, n7, n8, n28, n40, n41, n66, n77, n78
8 5G bands
n1, n3, n5, n8, n28, n38, n40, n41
In this performance comparison, the Vivo Y300 with its Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 (4nm) performs better than the Samsung Galaxy M16 with the Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6nm), thanks to superior chipset efficiency.
Samsung Galaxy M16 offers 6 years of OS updates, whereas Vivo Y300 provides 2 years. For security updates, Samsung Galaxy M16 offers 6 years of support compared to Vivo Y300's 3 years.
Both Samsung Galaxy M16 and Vivo Y300 feature AMOLED displays, offering vibrant colors and deeper blacks. In terms of smoothness, Vivo Y300 offers a higher 120 Hz refresh rate, ensuring fluid scrolling and animations. Vivo Y300 also boasts a brighter screen with 1800 nits of peak brightness, enhancing outdoor visibility. Both phones have the same screen resolution.
Both phones are equipped with the same 5000 mAh battery capacity. Vivo Y300 also supports faster wired charging at 80W, compared to 25W on Samsung Galaxy M16.
Vivo Y300 offers better protection against water and dust with an IP64 rating.
- Samsung Galaxy M16 – Check price here
- Vivo Y300 – Check price here
¹ Scores can vary even with the same chipset due to RAM, thermals, and software optimization.