Samsung Galaxy M35 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Vivo X200 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Samsung Galaxy M35

Samsung Galaxy M35
-
Exynos 1380
5 nm
-
6000 mAh
25W
-
6.6"
1080 x 2340 pixels
-
50 MP
4K@30fps
-
Specs
4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78
4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55
1x3.63 GHz Cortex-X925
3x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4
4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A720
8GB 256GB (UFS 2.2)
16GB 512GB (UFS 4.0)
f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.96", PDAF, OIS
8 MP
f/2.2, 123˚, (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
5 MP
f/2.4, (macro)
f/1.6, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", PDAF, OIS
50 MP
f/2.6, 70mm (periscope telephoto), 1/1.95", PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom
50 MP
f/2.0, 15mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF
1080p@30/60fps
720p@480fps
1080p
f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm
f/2.0, 20mm (ultrawide)
1080p@30fps
1080p@30/60fps
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano (Hybrid)
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
13 5G bands
n1, n3, n5, n7, n8, n20, n28, n38, n40, n41, n66, n77, n78
8 5G bands
n1, n3, n5, n8, n28, n40, n77, n78
In this performance comparison, the Vivo X200 with its Mediatek Dimensity 9400 (3nm) performs better than the Samsung Galaxy M35 with the Exynos 1380 (5nm), thanks to superior chipset efficiency.
Both Samsung Galaxy M35 and Vivo X200 offer the same software support — 4 years of OS updates and 5 years of security updates.
Both Samsung Galaxy M35 and Vivo X200 feature AMOLED displays, offering vibrant colors and deeper blacks. Both smartphones offer the same 120 Hz refresh rate. Vivo X200 also boasts a brighter screen with 4500 nits of peak brightness, enhancing outdoor visibility. Notably, Vivo X200 offers a higher screen resolution, resulting in sharper visuals and more detailed content.
Samsung Galaxy M35 comes with a larger 6000 mAh battery, which may offer longer usage on a single charge. Vivo X200 also supports faster wired charging at 90W, compared to 25W on Samsung Galaxy M35.
Vivo X200 includes an IP69 rating, while Samsung Galaxy M35 lacks an official IP rating.
- Samsung Galaxy M35 – Check price here
- Vivo X200 – Check price here
¹ Scores can vary even with the same chipset due to RAM, thermals, and software optimization.