Samsung Galaxy M35 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Vivo X200 Pro alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Samsung Galaxy M35

Samsung Galaxy M35
-
Exynos 1380
5 nm
-
6000 mAh
25W
-
6.6"
1080 x 2340 pixels
-
50 MP
4K@30fps
-
Specs
Vivo X200 Pro

Vivo X200 Pro
-
Dimensity 9400
3 nm
-
6000 mAh
90W
-
6.78"
1260 x 2800 pixels
-
50 MP
8K@30fps
-
Specs
4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78
4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55
1x3.63 GHz Cortex-X925
3x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4
4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A720
8GB 256GB (UFS 2.2)
f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.96", PDAF, OIS
8 MP
f/2.2, 123˚, (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
5 MP
f/2.4, (macro)
f/1.6, 23mm (wide), 1/1.28", 1.22µm, PDAF, OIS
200 MP
f/2.7, 85mm (periscope telephoto), 1/1.4", 0.56µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS, 3.7x optical zoom, macro 2.7:1
50 MP
f/2.0, 15mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF
1080p@30/60fps
720p@480fps
4K@30/60/120fps
1080p
f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm
f/2.0, 20mm (ultrawide)
1080p@30fps
1080p@30/60fps
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano (Hybrid)
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N7, N8, N20, N28, N66
TDD: N38, N40, N41, N77, N78
FDD: N1, N2, N3, N5, N7, N8, N12, N20, N25, N26, N28
TDD: N38, N40, N41, N66, N77, N78
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N7, N8, N20, N28, N66
TDD: N38, N40, N41, N77, N78
FDD: N1, N2, N3, N5, N7, N8, N12, N20, N25, N26, N28
TDD: N38, N40, N41, N66, N77, N78
In this performance comparison, the Vivo X200 Pro with its Mediatek Dimensity 9400 (3nm) performs better than the Samsung Galaxy M35 with the Exynos 1380 (5nm), thanks to superior chipset efficiency.
Both Samsung Galaxy M35 and Vivo X200 Pro offer the same software support — 4 years of OS updates and 5 years of security updates.
Both Samsung Galaxy M35 and Vivo X200 Pro feature AMOLED displays, offering vibrant colors and deeper blacks. Both smartphones offer the same 120 Hz refresh rate. Vivo X200 Pro also boasts a brighter screen with 4500 nits of peak brightness, enhancing outdoor visibility. Notably, Vivo X200 Pro offers a higher screen resolution, resulting in sharper visuals and more detailed content.
Both phones are equipped with the same 6000 mAh battery capacity. Vivo X200 Pro also supports faster wired charging at 90W, compared to 25W on Samsung Galaxy M35. Vivo X200 Pro supports wireless charging at 30W, while Samsung Galaxy M35 lacks this feature.
Vivo X200 Pro includes an IP69 rating, while Samsung Galaxy M35 lacks an official IP rating.
- Samsung Galaxy M35 – Check price here
- Vivo X200 Pro – Check price here
¹ Scores can vary even with the same chipset due to RAM, thermals, and software optimization.