Samsung Galaxy M35 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Vivo Y18t 4G alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Samsung Galaxy M35
Samsung Galaxy M35
-
Exynos 1380
5 nm
-
6000 mAh
25W
-
6.6"
1080 x 2340 pixels
-
50 MP
4K@30fps
-
Specs
Vivo Y18t 4G
Vivo Y18t 4G
-
Unisoc T612
12 nm
-
5000 mAh
15W
-
6.56"
720 x 1612 pixels
-
50 MP
1080p@30fps
-
Specs
4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78
4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55
2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A75
6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55
8GB 256GB (UFS 2.2)
f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.96", PDAF, OIS
8 MP
f/2.2, 123˚, (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
5 MP
f/2.4, (macro)
f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens
1080p@30/60fps
720p@480fps
f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm
f/2.0, (wide)
1080p@30fps
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano (Hybrid)
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N7, N8, N20, N28, N66
TDD: N38, N40, N41, N77, N78
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N7, N8, N20, N28, N66
TDD: N38, N40, N41, N77, N78
In this performance comparison, the Samsung Galaxy M35 with its Exynos 1380 (5nm) performs better than the Vivo Y18t 4G with the Unisoc Unisoc T612 (12nm), thanks to superior chipset efficiency.
Samsung Galaxy M35 features a superior AMOLED display, while Vivo Y18t 4G comes with an LCD panel. In terms of smoothness, Samsung Galaxy M35 offers a higher 120 Hz refresh rate, ensuring fluid scrolling and animations. Samsung Galaxy M35 also boasts a brighter screen with 1000 nits of peak brightness, enhancing outdoor visibility. Notably, Samsung Galaxy M35 offers a higher screen resolution, resulting in sharper visuals and more detailed content.
Samsung Galaxy M35 comes with a larger 6000 mAh battery, which may offer longer usage on a single charge. Samsung Galaxy M35 also supports faster wired charging at 25W, compared to 15W on Vivo Y18t 4G.
Vivo Y18t 4G includes an IP54 rating, while Samsung Galaxy M35 lacks an official IP rating.
- Samsung Galaxy M35 – Check price here
- Vivo Y18t 4G – Check price here
¹ Scores can vary even with the same chipset due to RAM, thermals, and software optimization.