Samsung Galaxy M36 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Vivo Y300 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Samsung Galaxy M36
Samsung Galaxy M36
-
Exynos 1380
5 nm
-
5000 mAh
25W
-
6.7"
1080x2340 pixels
-
50 MP
4K@30fps
-
Specs
4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78
4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55
2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78
6x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55
8GB 128GB (UFS 2.2)
8GB 256GB (UFS 2.2)
8GB 256GB (UFS 2.2)
f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.96", PDAF, OIS
8 MP
f/2.2, 123˚, (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP
f/2.4, (macro)
f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF
2 MP
f/2.4, (depth)
1080p@30/60fps
720p@480fps
f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm
f/2.5, (wide)
1080p@30fps
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano (Hybrid)
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
8 5G bands
n1, n3, n5, n8, n28, n40, n41, n78
8 5G bands
n1, n3, n5, n8, n28, n38, n40, n41
In this performance comparison, the Samsung Galaxy M36 with its Exynos 1380 (5nm) performs better than the Vivo Y300 with the Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 (4nm), thanks to superior chipset efficiency.
Samsung Galaxy M36 offers 6 years of OS updates, whereas Vivo Y300 provides 2 years. For security updates, Samsung Galaxy M36 offers 6 years of support compared to Vivo Y300's 3 years.
Both Samsung Galaxy M36 and Vivo Y300 feature AMOLED displays, offering vibrant colors and deeper blacks. Both smartphones offer the same 120 Hz refresh rate. Both devices deliver the same brightness level at nits. Both phones have the same screen resolution.
Both phones are equipped with the same 5000 mAh battery capacity. Vivo Y300 also supports faster wired charging at 80W, compared to 25W on Samsung Galaxy M36.
Vivo Y300 includes an IP64 rating, while Samsung Galaxy M36 lacks an official IP rating.
- Samsung Galaxy M36 – Check price here
- Vivo Y300 – Check price here
¹ Scores can vary even with the same chipset due to RAM, thermals, and software optimization.