Tecno Phantom V Fold2 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Vivo Y300 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Tecno Phantom V Fold2
Tecno Phantom V Fold2
-
Dimensity 9000+
4 nm
-
5750 mAh
70W
-
7.85"
2000 x 2296 pixels
-
50 MP
4K@30fps
-
Specs
1x3.20 GHz Cortex-X2
3x2.85 GHz Cortex-A710
4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510
2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78
6x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55
8GB 256GB (UFS 2.2)
f/1.9, 23mm (wide), 1/1.3", 1.2µm, PDAF, OIS
50 MP
f/2.0, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.8", 0.64µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom
50 MP
f/2.2, 115˚ (ultrawide), PDAF
f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF
2 MP
f/2.4, (depth)
1080p@30/60fps
f/2.5, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm
f/2.5, (wide)
f/2.5, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
14 5G bands
n1, n3, n5, n7, n8, n12, n20, n28, n38, n40, n41, n66, n77, n78
8 5G bands
n1, n3, n5, n8, n28, n38, n40, n41
In this performance comparison, the Tecno Phantom V Fold2 with its Mediatek Dimensity 9000+ (4nm) performs better than the Vivo Y300 with the Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 (4nm), thanks to superior chipset efficiency.
Both Tecno Phantom V Fold2 and Vivo Y300 offer the same software support — 2 years of OS updates and 3 years of security updates.
Both Tecno Phantom V Fold2 and Vivo Y300 feature AMOLED displays, offering vibrant colors and deeper blacks. Both smartphones offer the same 120 Hz refresh rate. Vivo Y300 also boasts a brighter screen with 1800 nits of peak brightness, enhancing outdoor visibility. Notably, Tecno Phantom V Fold2 offers a higher screen resolution, resulting in sharper visuals and more detailed content.
Tecno Phantom V Fold2 comes with a larger 5750 mAh battery, which may offer longer usage on a single charge. Vivo Y300 also supports faster wired charging at 80W, compared to 70W on Tecno Phantom V Fold2. Tecno Phantom V Fold2 supports wireless charging at 15W, while Vivo Y300 does not support wireless charging.
Vivo Y300 offers better protection against water and dust with an IP64 rating.
- Tecno Phantom V Fold2 – Check price here
- Vivo Y300 – Check price here
¹ Scores can vary even with the same chipset due to RAM, thermals, and software optimization.