Tecno Pova Curve 5G alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Vivo Y300 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Tecno Pova Curve 5G
Tecno Pova Curve 5G
-
Dimensity 7300
4 nm
-
5500 mAh
45W
-
6.78"
1080 x 2436 pixels
-
64 MP
4K@30fps
-
Specs
4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78
4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55
2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78
6x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55
8GB 128GB (UFS 2.2)
8GB 256GB (UFS 2.2)
Sony IMX682, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, PDAF
2 MP
f/2.4, (depth)
f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF
2 MP
f/2.4, (depth)
1080p@30fps
(Wide), f/2.2
f/2.5, (wide)
1080p@30fps
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
2 5G bands
n3, n38
8 5G bands
n1, n3, n5, n8, n28, n38, n40, n41
In this performance comparison, the Tecno Pova Curve 5G with its Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4nm) performs better than the Vivo Y300 with the Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 (4nm), thanks to superior chipset efficiency.
Tecno Pova Curve 5G launched with Android 15 and will receive updates until Android 17, whereas Vivo Y300 launched with Android 14 and will get Android 16. Both phones are expected to receive security updates until around 2027.
Both Tecno Pova Curve 5G and Vivo Y300 feature AMOLED displays, offering vibrant colors and deeper blacks. In terms of smoothness, Tecno Pova Curve 5G offers a higher 144 Hz refresh rate, ensuring fluid scrolling and animations. Vivo Y300 also boasts a brighter screen with 1800 nits of peak brightness, enhancing outdoor visibility. Both phones have the same screen resolution.
Tecno Pova Curve 5G comes with a larger 5500 mAh battery, which may offer longer usage on a single charge. Vivo Y300 also supports faster wired charging at 80W, compared to 45W on Tecno Pova Curve 5G.
Both phones feature the same IP64 rating for water and dust resistance.
¹ Scores can vary even with the same chipset due to RAM, thermals, and software optimization.