Tecno Pova Slim alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Tecno Spark 30C alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Tecno Pova Slim
Tecno Pova Slim
-
Dimensity 6400
6 nm
-
5160 mAh
45W
-
6.78"
1224 x 2720 pixels
-
50 MP
1440p@30fps
-
Specs
Tecno Spark 30C
Tecno Spark 30C
-
Dimensity 6300
6 nm
-
5000 mAh
18W
-
6.67"
720 x 1600 pixels
-
48 MP
1080p@30fps
-
Specs
2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A76
6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55
2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76
6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55
8GB 256GB (UFS 2.2)
4GB 128GB (eMMC 5.1)
f/1.79, (wide), PDAF
2 MP
(wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, AF
1080p@30fps
f/2.0, (wide)
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
2 5G bands
n3, n40
In this performance comparison, the Tecno Pova Slim with its Mediatek Dimensity 6400 (6nm) performs better than the Tecno Spark 30C with the Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6nm), thanks to superior chipset efficiency.
Tecno Pova Slim offers 1 years of OS updates, while Tecno Spark 30C does not have confirmed OS update information. Tecno Pova Slim receives 2 years of security updates, while Tecno Spark 30C does not have confirmed security update information.
Tecno Pova Slim features a superior AMOLED display, while Tecno Spark 30C comes with an LCD panel. In terms of smoothness, Tecno Pova Slim offers a higher 144 Hz refresh rate, ensuring fluid scrolling and animations. Both devices deliver the same brightness level at nits. Notably, Tecno Pova Slim offers a higher screen resolution, resulting in sharper visuals and more detailed content.
Tecno Pova Slim comes with a larger 5160 mAh battery, which may offer longer usage on a single charge. Tecno Pova Slim also supports faster wired charging at 45W, compared to 18W on Tecno Spark 30C.
Tecno Pova Slim offers better protection against water and dust with an IP64 rating.
- Tecno Pova Slim – Check price here
- Tecno Spark 30C – Check price here
¹ Scores can vary even with the same chipset due to RAM, thermals, and software optimization.