Tecno Pova Slim alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Vivo V40e alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Tecno Pova Slim
Tecno Pova Slim
-
Dimensity 6400
6 nm
-
5160 mAh
45W
-
6.78"
1224 x 2720 pixels
-
50 MP
1440p@30fps
-
Specs
2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A76
6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55
8GB 256GB (UFS 2.2)
8GB 256GB (UFS 2.2)
f/1.79, (wide), PDAF
2 MP
f/2.0, (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP
f/2.2, 116˚ (ultrawide)
1080p@30fps
1080p
f/2.0, (wide)
f/2.0, (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
8 5G bands
n1, n3, n5, n8, n28, n40, n77, n78
In this performance comparison, the Vivo V40e with its Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4nm) performs better than the Tecno Pova Slim with the Mediatek Dimensity 6400 (6nm), thanks to superior chipset efficiency.
Vivo V40e launched with Android 14 and will receive updates until Android 17, whereas Tecno Pova Slim launched with Android 15 and will get Android 16. Vivo V40e will get security updates until 2028 (approx. 4 years), while Tecno Pova Slim is supported till 2027.
Both Tecno Pova Slim and Vivo V40e feature AMOLED displays, offering vibrant colors and deeper blacks. In terms of smoothness, Tecno Pova Slim offers a higher 144 Hz refresh rate, ensuring fluid scrolling and animations. Both devices deliver the same brightness level at 4500 nits. Notably, Tecno Pova Slim offers a higher screen resolution, resulting in sharper visuals and more detailed content.
Vivo V40e features a larger 5500 mAh battery, potentially delivering better battery life. Vivo V40e also supports faster wired charging at 80W, compared to 45W on Tecno Pova Slim.
Both phones feature the same IP64 rating for water and dust resistance.
¹ Scores can vary even with the same chipset due to RAM, thermals, and software optimization.