Tecno Pova Slim alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Vivo Y300 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Tecno Pova Slim
Tecno Pova Slim
-
Dimensity 6400
6 nm
-
5160 mAh
45W
-
6.78"
1224 x 2720 pixels
-
50 MP
1440p@30fps
-
Specs
2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A76
6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55
2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78
6x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55
8GB 256GB (UFS 2.2)
8GB 256GB (UFS 2.2)
f/1.79, (wide), PDAF
2 MP
f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF
2 MP
f/2.4, (depth)
1080p@30fps
f/2.0, (wide)
f/2.5, (wide)
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
8 5G bands
n1, n3, n5, n8, n28, n38, n40, n41
In this performance comparison, the Tecno Pova Slim with its Mediatek Dimensity 6400 (6nm) performs better than the Vivo Y300 with the Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 (4nm), thanks to superior chipset efficiency.
Vivo Y300 offers 2 years of OS updates, whereas Tecno Pova Slim provides 1 years. For security updates, Vivo Y300 offers 3 years of support compared to Tecno Pova Slim's 2 years.
Both Tecno Pova Slim and Vivo Y300 feature AMOLED displays, offering vibrant colors and deeper blacks. In terms of smoothness, Tecno Pova Slim offers a higher 144 Hz refresh rate, ensuring fluid scrolling and animations. Tecno Pova Slim also boasts a brighter screen with 4500 nits of peak brightness, enhancing outdoor visibility. Notably, Tecno Pova Slim offers a higher screen resolution, resulting in sharper visuals and more detailed content.
Tecno Pova Slim comes with a larger 5160 mAh battery, which may offer longer usage on a single charge. Vivo Y300 also supports faster wired charging at 80W, compared to 45W on Tecno Pova Slim.
Both phones feature the same IP64 rating for water and dust resistance.
- Tecno Pova Slim – Check price here
- Vivo Y300 – Check price here
¹ Scores can vary even with the same chipset due to RAM, thermals, and software optimization.