Tecno Pova Slim alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
vivo Y400 Pro alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Tecno Pova Slim

Tecno Pova Slim
-
Dimensity 6400
6 nm
-
5160 mAh
45W
-
6.78"
1224 x 2720 pixels
-
50 MP
1440p@30fps
-
Specs
vivo Y400 Pro

vivo Y400 Pro
-
Dimensity 7300
4 nm
-
5500 mAh
90W
-
6.77"
1080 x 2392 pixels
-
50 MP
4K@30fps
-
Specs
2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A76
6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55
4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78
4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55
8GB 256GB (UFS 2.2)
8GB 256GB (UFS 3.1)
f/1.79, (wide), PDAF
2 MP
Sony IMX882, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF
2 MP
f/2.4, (depth)
1080p@30fps
1080p@30fps
f/2.0, (wide)
f/2.45, (wide)
1080p@30fps
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
10 5G bands
n1, n3, n5, n8, n28, n38, n40, n41, n77, n78
In this performance comparison, the vivo Y400 Pro with its Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4nm) performs better than the Tecno Pova Slim with the Mediatek Dimensity 6400 (6nm), thanks to superior chipset efficiency.
Tecno Pova Slim offers 1 years of OS updates, while vivo Y400 Pro does not have confirmed OS update information. Tecno Pova Slim receives 2 years of security updates, while vivo Y400 Pro does not have confirmed security update information.
Both Tecno Pova Slim and vivo Y400 Pro feature AMOLED displays, offering vibrant colors and deeper blacks. In terms of smoothness, Tecno Pova Slim offers a higher 144 Hz refresh rate, ensuring fluid scrolling and animations. Both devices deliver the same brightness level at 4500 nits. Notably, Tecno Pova Slim offers a higher screen resolution, resulting in sharper visuals and more detailed content.
vivo Y400 Pro features a larger 5500 mAh battery, potentially delivering better battery life. vivo Y400 Pro also supports faster wired charging at 90W, compared to 45W on Tecno Pova Slim.
vivo Y400 Pro offers better protection against water and dust with an IP65 rating.
- Tecno Pova Slim – Check price here
- vivo Y400 Pro – Check price here
¹ Scores can vary even with the same chipset due to RAM, thermals, and software optimization.