Tecno Spark 30C alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Vivo X200 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Tecno Spark 30C
Tecno Spark 30C
-
Dimensity 6300
6 nm
-
5000 mAh
18W
-
6.67"
720 x 1600 pixels
-
48 MP
1080p@30fps
-
Specs
2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76
6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55
1x3.63 GHz Cortex-X925
3x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4
4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A720
4GB 128GB (eMMC 5.1)
16GB 512GB (UFS 4.0)
(wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, AF
f/1.6, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", PDAF, OIS
50 MP
f/2.6, 70mm (periscope telephoto), 1/1.95", PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom
50 MP
f/2.0, 15mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF
1080p
f/2.0, 20mm (ultrawide)
1080p@30/60fps
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
2 5G bands
n3, n40
8 5G bands
n1, n3, n5, n8, n28, n40, n77, n78
In this performance comparison, the Vivo X200 with its Mediatek Dimensity 9400 (3nm) performs better than the Tecno Spark 30C with the Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6nm), thanks to superior chipset efficiency.
Vivo X200 offers 4 years of OS updates, while Tecno Spark 30C does not have confirmed OS update information. Vivo X200 receives 5 years of security updates, while Tecno Spark 30C does not have confirmed security update information.
Vivo X200 features a superior AMOLED display, while Tecno Spark 30C comes with an LCD panel. Both smartphones offer the same 120 Hz refresh rate. Both devices deliver the same brightness level at nits. Notably, Vivo X200 offers a higher screen resolution, resulting in sharper visuals and more detailed content.
Vivo X200 features a larger 5800 mAh battery, potentially delivering better battery life. Vivo X200 also supports faster wired charging at 90W, compared to 18W on Tecno Spark 30C.
Vivo X200 offers better protection against water and dust with an IP69 rating.
- Tecno Spark 30C – Check price here
- Vivo X200 – Check price here
¹ Scores can vary even with the same chipset due to RAM, thermals, and software optimization.