Vivo V40e alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Vivo X200 Pro alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Vivo X200 Pro

Vivo X200 Pro
-
Dimensity 9400
3 nm
-
6000 mAh
90W
-
6.78"
1260 x 2800 pixels
-
50 MP
8K@30fps
-
Specs
1x3.63 GHz Cortex-X925
3x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4
4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A720
8GB 256GB (UFS 2.2)
f/2.0, (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP
f/2.2, 116˚ (ultrawide)
f/1.6, 23mm (wide), 1/1.28", 1.22µm, PDAF, OIS
200 MP
f/2.7, 85mm (periscope telephoto), 1/1.4", 0.56µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS, 3.7x optical zoom, macro 2.7:1
50 MP
f/2.0, 15mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF
1080p
4K@30/60/120fps
1080p
f/2.0, (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF
f/2.0, 20mm (ultrawide)
1080p@30/60fps
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
8 5G bands
n1, n3, n5, n8, n28, n40, n77, n78
17 5G bands
n1, n2, n3, n5, n7, n8, n12, n20, n25, n26, n28, n38, n40, n41, n66, n77, n78
In this performance comparison, the Vivo X200 Pro with its Mediatek Dimensity 9400 (3nm) performs better than the Vivo V40e with the Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4nm), thanks to superior chipset efficiency.
Vivo X200 Pro offers 4 years of OS updates, whereas Vivo V40e provides 3 years. For security updates, Vivo X200 Pro offers 5 years of support compared to Vivo V40e's 4 years.
Both Vivo V40e and Vivo X200 Pro feature AMOLED displays, offering vibrant colors and deeper blacks. Both smartphones offer the same 120 Hz refresh rate. Both devices deliver the same brightness level at 4500 nits. Notably, Vivo X200 Pro offers a higher screen resolution, resulting in sharper visuals and more detailed content.
Vivo X200 Pro features a larger 6000 mAh battery, potentially delivering better battery life. Vivo X200 Pro also supports faster wired charging at 90W, compared to 80W on Vivo V40e. Vivo X200 Pro supports wireless charging at 30W, while Vivo V40e lacks this feature.
Vivo X200 Pro offers better protection against water and dust with an IP69 rating.
- Vivo V40e – Check price here
- Vivo X200 Pro – Check price here
¹ Scores can vary even with the same chipset due to RAM, thermals, and software optimization.