Samsung Galaxy M16 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Vivo X200 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Samsung Galaxy M16

Samsung Galaxy M16
-
Dimensity 6300
6 nm
-
5000 mAh
25W
-
6.7"
1080 x 2340 pixels
-
50 MP
1080p@30fps
2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76
6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55
1x3.63 GHz Cortex-X925
3x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4
4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A720
6GB 128GB
8GB 128GB
16GB 512GB (UFS 4.0)
f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF
5 MP
f/2.2, (ultrawide), 1/5.0", 1.12µm
2 MP
f/2.4, (macro)
f/1.6, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", PDAF, OIS
50 MP
f/2.6, 70mm (periscope telephoto), 1/1.95", PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom
50 MP
f/2.0, 15mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF
1080p
f/2.0, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm
f/2.0, 20mm (ultrawide)
1080p@30/60fps
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano (Hybrid)
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N7, N8, N28, N66
TDD: N40, N41, N77, N78
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N40, N77, N78
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N7, N8, N28, N66
TDD: N40, N41, N77, N78
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N40, N77, N78
In this comparison, the Vivo X200 with the Mediatek Dimensity 9400 (3nm) performs better than the Samsung Galaxy M16 with the Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6nm), thanks to its more efficient chipset.
The Samsung Galaxy M16 offers 6 years of OS updates, while the Vivo X200 provides 4 years. When it comes to security updates, Samsung Galaxy M16 leads with 6 years of support.
Both phones feature AMOLED displays. Moreover, Vivo X200 offers a higher 120 Hz refresh rate for smoother scrolling. Vivo X200 also has a brighter display with 4500 nits, improving outdoor visibility. Notably, Vivo X200 has a higher resolution display, resulting in sharper visuals.
Vivo X200 has a larger 5800 mAh battery for longer usage. Vivo X200 supports faster wired charging at 90W.
Vivo X200 offers better water and dust resistance with an IP69 rating.