Tecno Spark 20 Pro alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Vivo X200 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Tecno Spark 20 Pro

Tecno Spark 20 Pro
-
Dimensity 6080
6 nm
-
5000 mAh
33W
-
6.78"
1080x2460 pixels
-
108 MP
1440p@30fps
2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76
6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55
1x3.63 GHz Cortex-X925
3x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4
4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A720
8GB 256GB (UFS 2.2)
16GB 512GB (UFS 4.0)
f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.67", 0.64µm, PDAF
2 MP
f/2.4, (macro)
f/1.6, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", PDAF, OIS
50 MP
f/2.6, 70mm (periscope telephoto), 1/1.95", PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom
50 MP
f/2.0, 15mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF
1080p@30fps
1080p
wide
f/2.0, 20mm (ultrawide)
1080p@30fps
1080p@30/60fps
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
FDD: N3
TDD: N40
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N40, N77, N78
FDD: N3
TDD: N40
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N40, N77, N78
In this comparison, the Vivo X200 with the Mediatek Dimensity 9400 (3nm) performs better than the Tecno Spark 20 Pro with the Mediatek Dimensity 6080 (6nm), thanks to its more efficient chipset.
Vivo X200 has a superior AMOLED display, while Tecno Spark 20 Pro uses an LCD panel. They have the same 120 Hz refresh rate. Vivo X200 also has a brighter display with 4500 nits, improving outdoor visibility. Notably, Vivo X200 has a higher resolution display, resulting in sharper visuals.
Vivo X200 has a larger 5800 mAh battery for longer usage. Vivo X200 supports faster wired charging at 90W.
Vivo X200 offers better water and dust resistance with an IP69 rating.