Vivo X200 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Vivo Y39 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
1x3.63 GHz Cortex-X925
3x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4
4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A720
2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78
6x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55
16GB 512GB (UFS 4.0)
8GB 256GB (UFS 2.2)
f/1.6, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", PDAF, OIS
50 MP
f/2.6, 70mm (periscope telephoto), 1/1.95", PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom
50 MP
f/2.0, 15mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF
f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
2 MP
f/2.4, (depth)
1080p
f/2.0, 20mm (ultrawide)
f/2.0, (wide)
1080p@30/60fps
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N40, N77, N78
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N40, N77, N78
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N40, N77, N78
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N40, N77, N78
In this performance comparison, the Vivo X200 with its Mediatek Dimensity 9400 (3nm) performs better than the Vivo Y39 with the Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 (4nm), thanks to superior chipset efficiency.
Vivo X200 offers 4 years of OS updates, whereas Vivo Y39 provides 2 years. For security updates, Vivo X200 offers 5 years of support compared to Vivo Y39's 3 years.
Vivo X200 features a superior AMOLED display, while Vivo Y39 comes with an LCD panel. Both smartphones offer the same 120 Hz refresh rate. Vivo X200 also boasts a brighter screen with 4500 nits of peak brightness, enhancing outdoor visibility. Notably, Vivo X200 offers a higher screen resolution, resulting in sharper visuals and more detailed content.
Vivo Y39 features a larger 6500 mAh battery, potentially delivering better battery life. Vivo X200 also supports faster wired charging at 90W, compared to 44W on Vivo Y39.
Vivo X200 offers better protection against water and dust with an IP69 rating.
- Vivo X200 – Check price here
- Vivo Y39 – Check price here
¹ Scores can vary even with the same chipset due to RAM, thermals, and software optimization.