Vivo X200 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
vivo Y400 Pro alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
vivo Y400 Pro

vivo Y400 Pro
-
Dimensity 7300
4 nm
-
5500 mAh
90W
-
6.77"
1080 x 2392 pixels
-
50 MP
4K@30fps
-
Specs
1x3.63 GHz Cortex-X925
3x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4
4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A720
4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78
4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55
16GB 512GB (UFS 4.0)
8GB 256GB (UFS 3.1)
f/1.6, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", PDAF, OIS
50 MP
f/2.6, 70mm (periscope telephoto), 1/1.95", PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom
50 MP
f/2.0, 15mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF
Sony IMX882, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF
2 MP
f/2.4, (depth)
1080p
1080p@30fps
f/2.0, 20mm (ultrawide)
f/2.45, (wide)
1080p@30/60fps
1080p@30fps
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N40, N77, N78
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N38, N40, N41, N77, N78
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N40, N77, N78
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N38, N40, N41, N77, N78
In this performance comparison, the Vivo X200 with its Mediatek Dimensity 9400 (3nm) performs better than the vivo Y400 Pro with the Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4nm), thanks to superior chipset efficiency.
Vivo X200 offers 4 years of OS updates, while vivo Y400 Pro does not have confirmed OS update information. Vivo X200 receives 5 years of security updates, while vivo Y400 Pro does not have confirmed security update information.
Both Vivo X200 and vivo Y400 Pro feature AMOLED displays, offering vibrant colors and deeper blacks. Both smartphones offer the same 120 Hz refresh rate. Both devices deliver the same brightness level at 4500 nits. Notably, Vivo X200 offers a higher screen resolution, resulting in sharper visuals and more detailed content.
Vivo X200 comes with a larger 5800 mAh battery, which may offer longer usage on a single charge. Both devices support the same wired charging speed of 90W.
Vivo X200 offers better protection against water and dust with an IP69 rating.
- Vivo X200 – Check price here
- vivo Y400 Pro – Check price here
¹ Scores can vary even with the same chipset due to RAM, thermals, and software optimization.