Honor 200 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Vivo Y300 Plus alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Vivo Y300 Plus

Vivo Y300 Plus
-
Snapdragon 695
6 nm
-
5000 mAh
44W
-
6.78"
1080 x 2400 pixels
-
50 MP
1080p@30fps
1x2.63 GHz Cortex-A715
4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A715
3x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510
2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold
6x1.8 GHz Kryo 660 Silver
12GB 512GB (UFS 3.1)
f/2.0, (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
50 MP
f/2.4, (telephoto), PDAF, OIS, 2.5x optical zoom
12 MP
f/2.2, 112˚ (ultrawide), AF
f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
2 MP
f/2.4, (depth)
1080p@30/60fps
f/2.1, (wide)
f/2.5, (wide)
1080p@30fps
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
FDD: N3
TDD: N40
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8
TDD: N77, N78
FDD: N3
TDD: N40
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N77, N78
In this comparison, the Honor 200 with the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4nm) performs better than the Vivo Y300 Plus with the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 (6nm), thanks to its more efficient chipset.
Both phones offer the same OS update support and receive security updates for the same duration.
Both phones feature AMOLED displays. They have the same 120 Hz refresh rate. Honor 200 also has a brighter display with 4000 nits, improving outdoor visibility. Notably, Honor 200 has a higher resolution display, resulting in sharper visuals.
Honor 200 has a larger 5200 mAh battery for longer usage. Honor 200 supports faster wired charging at 100W.
Vivo Y300 Plus has an IP54 rating, while Honor 200 lacks official water and dust resistance.