Motorola Razr 50 Ultra alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Vivo Y300 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra

Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
-
Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
4 nm
-
4000 mAh
45W
-
6.9"
1080x2640 pixels
-
50 MP
4K@30/60fps
1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X4
4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A720
3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A520
2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78
6x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55
8GB 256GB (UFS 2.2)
f/1.7, 24mm (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS
50 MP
f/2.0, (telephoto), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom
f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF
2 MP
f/2.4, (depth)
1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps
f/2.4, (wide), 0.7µm
f/2.5, (wide)
1080p@30/60fps
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: eSIM
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
FDD: N1, N2, N3, N5, N7, N8, N20, N26, N28
TDD: N38, N40, N41, N66, N71, N75, N77, N78
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N38, N40, N41
FDD: N1, N2, N3, N5, N7, N8, N20, N26, N28
TDD: N38, N40, N41, N66, N71, N75, N77, N78
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N40, N77, N78
In this comparison, the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra with the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4nm) performs better than the Vivo Y300 with the Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 (4nm), thanks to its more efficient chipset.
The Motorola Razr 50 Ultra offers 3 years of OS updates, while the Vivo Y300 provides 2 years. When it comes to security updates, Motorola Razr 50 Ultra leads with 5 years of support.
Both phones feature AMOLED displays. Moreover, it offers a higher 165 Hz refresh rate for smoother scrolling. Motorola Razr 50 Ultra also has a brighter display with 3000 nits, improving outdoor visibility. These phones have the same resolution.
Vivo Y300 has a larger 5000 mAh battery for longer usage. Vivo Y300 supports faster wired charging at 80W. Motorola Razr 50 Ultra supports wireless charging at 15W, while Vivo Y300 lacks this feature.
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra offers better water and dust resistance with an IPX8 rating.